John Robson: Poilievre Must Firmly Oppose Online Harms Act’s Excessive Measures
Commentary
Despite the challenges faced by Canada’s governing institutions, the introduction of the “Online Harms Act,” also known as Bill C-63, signals a concerning infringement on free speech and due process. This act even allows for preemptive incarceration based on anticipated speech. It presents an opportunity for potential Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre to take a principled stand. Will he seize it?
Canadians often underestimate the severity of the issues due to a belief in their own moderation and sensibility. Regardless of how extreme public policy becomes, there is a prevailing sense of safety within the supposed moderate middle. However, the reality of the situation may reveal otherwise, with unaffordability, inefficacy, and unfairness present in various sectors such as healthcare, military, spending, and accountability.
Upon closer examination of the bill, Poilievre’s stance seems to have softened, particularly concerning aspects like protecting children and prohibiting certain harmful online content. However, the disregard for due process highlighted in the bill’s provisions, including empowering activists to bring individuals before tribunals without proper legal recourse, remains a point of contention.
As the public awaits his response to pressing issues like climate change and defense spending, Poilievre’s approach continues to raise uncertainty. Will he uphold his promises and take decisive action, or will he navigate the political landscape cautiously, adjusting his stance to secure electoral victory?
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
