Journalist Warns that Mass Migration Could Lead to the Abolishment of Nations

A new wave of global mass migration has the potential to loosen the bonds that unite people as a nation, with individual countries gradually losing their national identities, American journalist and Epoch Times contributor Alex Newman says.

One of the objectives of mass migration is “to undermine national homogeneity,” Mr. Newman said, citing late United Nations migration chief Peter Sutherland. “They want to create multicultural societies, whereby people have very little in common with each other.”

Related Stories

Mr. Newman said that traditionally, the nation-state has been seen mostly as an extension of the family.

People of each nation had a lot in common, he said.

For example, in Europe, each nation shared a culture, language, and ethnicity, such as the Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, or Germans.

Even if nations conquered each other and several nations were governed as one big empire, they still retained their national identity, Mr. Newman said.

However, mass migration undermines “the nation-state itself,” and this is done “very deliberately and very strategically,” he asserted.

“We’re watching this happen very rapidly in Europe,” he said. “I think Europe is the canary in the coal mine.”

Natives in Minority

Now, in big cities in the western and northern parts of Europe, “the native population is in the minority,” Mr. Newman said.

According to the UK Parliament’s report, 37 percent of London’s population was born outside the UK in 2021.

When native people in these big cities find themselves surrounded by people of other nationalities who do not have anything in common with them and do not share the same language, culture, and religion, they will start questioning the idea of the nation, Mr. Newman said.

“Why do we have these arbitrary lines on a map called a nation? Why not just be European citizens—which is of course step one—and then ultimately, global citizens?” he said. “That is the ultimate objective. They probably won’t come out of the closet too openly until they think it’s irreversible.”

The situation in America is different because America as a nation was not established based on any ethnicity, common culture, or common religion, Mr. Newman said. “America was a nation based on an idea,” he said.

The idea, enshrined in America’s founding documents, is “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,” and the governments are established to “secure these rights,” Mr. Newman said, citing the Declaration of Independence.

That idea “attracted people from all different nations from around the world to come here and settle here and become part of the American nation,” he said.

That idea is “under attack as well” in an effort “to undermine the nation, and ultimately, the nation-state in preparation for regional governance, and then global governance,” Mr. Newman asserted.

Global Government

The critical part of the shift toward globalization is the regionalization process, Mr. Newman said.

“A lot of the globalist strategists of the last couple of generations have openly argued that the path to true global government will be through regional governments,” he said. “Then you merge all of these into a single global system.”

Mr. Newman considers supranational organizations, such as the European Union, Eurasian Economic Union, and African Union, to be regional governments.

As for the global government, the United Nations already has “all the attributes” of a government, such as a police force, military, court system, multiple law enforcement programs, environmental bureaucracy, health bureaucracy, and an intellectual property system, Mr. Newman said.

If the court succeeds in prosecuting Mr. Netanyahu, it will create a precedent for global jurisdiction over every human being on the planet, Mr. Newman said.

The Eurasian Economic Union, consisting of five post-Soviet countries, is formally a project for economic integration in the former Soviet region with a goal to establish a common market mimicking the single market of the European Union (EU), according to UK-based Chatham House.

The Eurasian union—established in 2014 and joined by Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia—also mirrors the EU’s institutions, the British think tank said.

All these show that globalists “want more power,” Mr. Newman said. “If they’re not stopped, we will end up with a one world political, economic, and potentially even religious system.”

Mass Migration Redefined

The United Nations adopted in 2018 a new international agreement that radically changed the definition of immigration “from a privilege to a right,” Mr. Newman explained.

According to the compact, a person has a right to migrate to another country where life is better, especially if the person lives in a poor country, a country plagued by gang violence, or for any other reason, Mr. Newman said.

The agreement is “not technically enforceable” in courts, and no one will be sanctioned for not obeying it, so it is considered “soft law,” Mr. Newman explained.

However, when it gets embedded into national legal codes and judicial decisions, it becomes “hard law,” Mr. Newman pointed out.

“The objective of the hard law is to totally restructure all the immigration codes [and] legal systems in the world to facilitate enormous movements of people,” primarily into Western countries, Mr. Newman asserted.

An important component of the compact is censorship consisting of a two-pronged approach, Mr. Newman said. The first is propagandizing people into accepting the mass migration; the second is silencing those who speak against it, he added.

The compact was endorsed by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2018 by an overwhelming majority of 152 votes in favor to five votes against (Czechia,



Source link