Matas: Progress Towards Ending Forced Organ Harvesting is Moving Too Slowly
The human rights lawyer has returned to Australia, again urging stronger action to end systemic organ harvesting.
International human rights lawyer David Matas has remarked that the progress to end the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) practice of forced organ harvesting has been “very slow.”
Mr. Matas’s work has seen him involved in efforts against apartheid in South Africa, repression under the Soviet Union, and dictatorships in Latin America.
However, he said progress by the free world towards eliminating the Chinese regime’s systemic organ harvesting practice was glacial.
“I’ve been on this file since 2006. It’s 18 years,“ he told the Epoch Times on June 4 during his visit to the Australian Parliament. ”That’s slow.”
In July 2006, Mr. Matas and David Kilgour, a former Canadian secretary of state and human rights lawyer, published their report, which concluded that state-sanctioned organ harvesting was happening in China.
CCP Sees Falun Gong as ‘Political Enemies’
Falun Gong was widely popular and even celebrated by Chinese officials throughout the 1990s until then-CCP leader Jiang Zemin unilaterally launched a violent campaign as the millennium came to a close.
Related Stories
The practice’s popularity and its emphasis on moral values, harkening to China’s Buddhist- and Toaist-steeped culture prior to the communist regime, were perceived as a threat to its atheist ideology.
As a result of the oppression, the past 25 years have seen thousands of adherents sent to prisons, detention centers, mental hospitals, and brainwashing classes while also suffering physical and mental torture, including sleep deprivation, beatings, force-feeding, and sexual abuse.
“The killings eliminate what the Party sees as its political enemies.”
Australia Behind Other Countries, But Can ‘Set an Example’
Mr. Matas said progress had been made in addressing organ harvesting, but the final goal of stopping it had not been reached.
“Since that time, there have been changes, and there are a number of countries that have enacted legislation or inhibited complicity in transplant abuse abroad,” he said. “But Australia has not.”
The lawyer listed the stop-start nature of action against China’s organ harvesting.
“There was a Human Rights Commission report in 2018 (in Australia). There was a government response to that report, which accepted recommendations on legislation.
“There is a five-year action plan on human trafficking. They made findings that came out in March 2023 and they’re doing consultations now.
“There is a Senate bill on data collection through customs declarations, and the Senate committee reiterated its support for the 2018 legislation,” Mr. Matas said.
While Australia is a small country with a smaller impact compared to the United States and Canada, the human rights laywer emphasised that any country could set an example through legislation and take a united front in addressing these issues.
“I think Australia doesn’t have the global influence the United States does, but they can set an example. The more united their front is on this issue, the more effective it’s going to be,” Mr. Matas said.
“My view is: this is something that needs constant effort.”
