Federal cabinet ministers are defending the government’s decision to allow Canadian businesses tax relief on Chinese goods that were just hit with tariffs this month over concerns about the regime’s unfair trade practices.
Ottawa imposed a 100 percent surtax on Chinese-made EVs effective Oct. 1, while a 25 percent surtax on Chinese steel and aluminum products will take effect this week. The government is also bringing in potential surtaxes on critical manufacturing sector products, such as battery parts, semiconductors, and critical minerals. Less than two months after announcing the measures, the government has initiated a process for Canadian businesses to request remission of the surtaxes.
A remission, which the government describes as a “rare and extraordinary measure,” offers full or partial relief from federal taxes, interest, penalties, or other debts owed under tax laws enforced by the Canada Revenue Agency.
The exemptions drew criticism from Conservative MPs during an Oct. 21 meeting of the Commons Standing Committee on International Trade. “What’s the point of having the tariff in the first place if you’re going to allow companies to be exempt from them?” Tory MP Tony Baldinelli asked.
Asked whether the measure was implemented at the request of major auto companies like Volkswagen and Stellantis, which have received government funding to build EV battery plants in Canada, International Trade Minister Mary Ng said the exemption will give industries time to adapt to changes in the supply chain.
“I think that you would agree that listening to Canadian supply chain partners is really important,” Ng said. “Some companies could be impacted directly as a result of these tariffs. And if companies are impacted by these tariffs—small and medium-sized companies—then there should be a remission order process to what we can help them.”
Related Stories
Conservative MP Rick Perkins posed a similar question to Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne. Perkins said he recently met with Volkswagen executives who reported difficulties sourcing critical minerals to manufacture EV batteries in Canada and said they relied on China for the materials.
“Can you explain to me if that’s the reason why, a month after your government imposed tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, you’ve provided a way for companies to actually get around them with the remission order?” Perkins asked.
Champagne rejected the suggestion, saying he had spoken with the automakers and they did not raise the exemption issue.
“It is quite standard when you have tariffs that are imposed, that you have what you call remission order exemption to support our small and medium-sized businesses in very exceptional cases,” the minister said.
The Epoch Times contacted both Volkswagen and Stellantis for comment but did not hear back by publication time.
In July 2023, the federal and Ontario governments announced joint funding for EV and battery projects, providing up to $15 billion in incentives to Stellantis and $13 billion to Volkswagen and its subsidiary PowerCo SE to help create thousands of auto-related jobs.
Sourcing Critical Minerals
Conservative international trade critic Ryan Williams asked Ng how Canada can sustain its zero-emissions goal and mandate 100 percent zero-emission vehicle sales by 2035 while relying heavily on China for key minerals to manufacture batteries.
“You are making the assumption that we will keep buying [at the same order of] magnitude to 2035,” said Ng, adding the government incentives will allow Canada to extract and process those critical minerals and share them with partners like the United States, Australia, Korea, and Japan.
Williams followed up by saying Canadian critical mineral projects take an average of 10 years to get government approval, presenting a significant challenge for businesses. The Ontario Mining Association has reported a longer timeline of 10 to 15 years for consultation, exploration, and other procedures before a mine can be brought into production.
Williams cited recent concerns raised by BMW CEO Oliver Zipse about the feasibility of a similar emissions target in the European Union. Zipse said a ban on gas vehicles by 2035 is “no longer realistic” due to current market dynamics and pointed out risks related to the EU’s reliance on Chinese EV battery manufacturers.
“Geopolitical resilience and access to markets and raw materials remains critical to success and future viability while also reducing dependencies on China through openness to technologies,” Zipse said during the 2024 Paris Automotive Summit on Oct. 15.[Timestamp 11:17]
“A correction” of the 100 percent EV target for 2035 “as part of a comprehensive CO2-reduction package would also afford European OEMs [original equipment manufacturers] less reliance on China for batteries,” he said.
In Canada, several EV battery manufacturers have recently delayed or halted their plans to construct new plants. In July, Umicore Rechargeable Battery Materials Canada Inc. announced a delay in the construction of its battery materials plant in central eastern Ontario in response to a “significant slowdown” in EV sales.
In September, Swedish electric vehicle battery maker Northvolt also signalled possible delays in building its Quebec plant, citing challenges in the current economic climate, which prompted a change in its strategy.