World News

MPs Urge Minister to Testify Regarding Alleged Withholding of Documents in Foreign Interference Inquiry.


Opposition MPs have united against the Liberals to demand the Public Safety Minister’s testimony regarding the government’s withholding of documents from the Foreign Interference Inquiry.

On May 28, MPs on the House of Commons Procedure and House Affairs Committee voted on a Tory motion.

The motion presented by Conservative MP Michael Cooper initially requested the cabinet to provide all documents in unredacted form to the commission, but with the support of the NDP and the Bloc Québécois, the clause was removed by the Liberals.

In the end, NDP and Bloc MPs joined forces with the Tories to summon Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc, along with representatives from the Privy Council Office (PCO) and the Foreign Interference Inquiry, for testimony.

Mr. Cooper’s motion referenced reporting by the Globe and Mail indicating that the cabinet is “withholding an undisclosed number of documents requested by the Commissioner” and that nearly 10 percent of the documents provided by the cabinet are redacted.

Commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue submitted her interim report on May 3. While the report was based on access to “relevant documents without any redactions for reasons of national security,” she mentioned not being able to view some records in a footnote.

Related Stories

“Some documents contained redactions for Cabinet confidence, solicitor-client privilege, or protection of personal information,” as stated in the footnote. “Discussions regarding the application of these privileges are ongoing.”

The Epoch Times reached out to Public Safety, PCO, and the interference commission for comments but did not receive an immediate response.

The terms of reference for the inquiry direct the commissioner to have access to confidential cabinet documents.

“Justice Hogue will have full access to all relevant cabinet documents, as well as all other information she deems relevant for the purposes of her inquiry,” Mr. LeBlanc stated when announcing the inquiry last September.

Bloc Québécois MP Alain Therrien raised the issue in the House of Commons on May 23, questioning the minister on the withholding of documents that “undermines the commission’s effectiveness.”

“Does he agree that enough is enough with the secrecy?” Mr. Therrien asked.

“He knows very well that we are committed to sharing cabinet information with the commission,” Mr. LeBlanc responded. “We will always be available to collaborate with the commission to ensure access to all appropriate documents.”

Democracy Watch, an advocacy group with intervener status in the inquiry, addressed the matter in its February submission. In light of the cabinet redactions, it urged the commission to request unredacted versions of the documents.

Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch, expressed that since security agencies provided unredacted documents to the commission, the cabinet should follow suit.

“If the Trudeau Cabinet continues to conceal records from the inquiry into foreign interference, Canadians are justified in assuming that the disclosure of these records could reflect negatively on the Cabinet, which is why they are being kept confidential,” Mr. Conacher conveyed to The Epoch Times via email.

He added that the secrecy impedes the commissioner from “determining who knew what, when they knew it, and what they did.”

The commission was established in September after extensive negotiations between parties on the inquiry’s terms of reference and the selection of a commissioner. This followed initial reluctance by the Liberal government to conduct an inquiry and the resignation of special rapporteur on foreign interference David Johnston.

The inquiry’s mandate focuses on interference by China, Russia, and other state and non-state actors, with primary attention on China so far.

“Based on intelligence gathered by Canada’s intelligence agencies, the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) emerges as a significant foreign interference actor against Canada,” Ms. Hogue’s report states.

The report clarifies that Canadian intelligence agencies did not detect Russian interference in the 2019 or 2021 general elections.

The commissioner concluded in her interim report that foreign interference did not impact the national election results in 2019 and 2021, although individual ridings may have been affected.

“I nonetheless determine that foreign interference influenced the overall election environment in 2019 and 2021,” she noted.

The commission is required to present a final report before the end of the year.



Source link

TruthUSA

I'm TruthUSA, the author behind TruthUSA News Hub located at https://truthusa.us/. With our One Story at a Time," my aim is to provide you with unbiased and comprehensive news coverage. I dive deep into the latest happenings in the US and global events, and bring you objective stories sourced from reputable sources. My goal is to keep you informed and enlightened, ensuring you have access to the truth. Stay tuned to TruthUSA News Hub to discover the reality behind the headlines and gain a well-rounded perspective on the world.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.