Reviving Engagement With China ‘Counterproductive and Dangerous’: Rep. Gallagher
In trying to engage China, the Biden administration is reviving a China policy that hasn’t worked for decades, warned Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.).
“Time and time again, engagement—particularly engagement just for the sake of engagement—has undermined the urgency we need to actually win this competition, the fact that the Biden ministration is reviving diplomatic and economic engagement as a core pillar of our grand strategy, I think is counterproductive and dangerous,” he told The Epoch Times’ sister outlet NTD.
Gallagher, who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), made the remarks as Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepares his travel to Beijing, one that would make the top U.S. diplomat the highest-ranking Biden administration official to visit China amid rising U.S.-China tensions.
Originally scheduled for February, the meeting had been shelved for months due to the fallout from the Chinese spy balloon that flew over the United States. In a tense preview just days ahead of the visit, China’s foreign minister Qin Gang rebuked Blinken in a June 14 phone call, telling the latter to stop “meddling with” what the regime described as its “internal affairs,” such as Taiwan.
Gallagher believes Blinken is making the trip at the wrong moment, noting that it was only a week after the public found out about the regime’s investment in Cuba for a “massive spying station right in our own neighborhood.”
“The attempts by the administration to revive engagement after it’s failed for 20 years, I just don’t know what that achieves other than to force us to slow walk certain defensive actions,” he said, citing sanctions on key Chinese officials over ongoing human rights abuses and the need to tighten export license to U.S. suppliers of blacklisted Chinese telecom firm Huawei, as examples.
“In order to even get to the negotiating table, it seems we make these concessions to the CCP or they humiliate us in the process,” he said.
Blinken’s efforts mark the latest in a string of attempts for Washington to engage with Beijing, which has largely resisted bilateral exchanges on military levels, including after the U.S. downed the Chinese surveillance balloon off the South Carolina coast. Gallagher recalled Beijing’s refusal earlier to a U.S. invitation to have Chinese Defense Minister Li Shangfu meet with Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin during a defense summit in Singapore in early June.
“They not only said ‘no thank you’—this is a sanctioned official, by the way,” said the Wisconsin lawmaker, referring to 2018 sanctions imposed on Li over his role in the purchases of aircraft and equipment from Russia. “They then sent a warship to buzz dangerously one of our destroyers in the vicinity of Taiwan.”
Earlier this month, the State Department’s assistant secretary Daniel Kritenbrink headed to Beijing for a “candid” and “productive” discussion with Chinese officials, which the U.S. side described as “part of ongoing efforts to maintain open lines of communication.”
But that move was inappropriate given the timing, Gallagher said, noting that it had coincided with the 34th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, the regime’s bloody military suppression that killed hundreds, if not thousands, of pro-democracy protesters.
The State Department has played down hopes that the Blinken meeting will yield a “breakthrough or transformation in the way that we deal with one another.”
“We’re coming to Beijing with a realistic, confident approach and a sincere desire to manage our competition in the most responsible way possible,” Daniel Kritenbrink, the State Department’s top diplomat for East Asia, told reporters in a briefing call on Wednesday.
Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.), a member of the House China Committee, echoed Gallagher’s view.
“We need to project strength, not weakness,” he told NTD. “And when you reward bad behavior, you get more bad behavior.”
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) is supportive of Blinken’s trip as he expressed hope to “de-conflict” by creating “some level of communication” on the defense side.
“I hope that he will create some paradigm of how there will be competition, but it doesn’t mean that we have to have conflicts,” he told The Epoch Times, adding that he also hopes the topic of tackling illicit fentanyl, the precursor of which has primarily flowed from China, makes into the bilateral discussion.
Gallagher said he is “all for a crisis communication channel,” but believes the initiative should come from the Chinese side.
“The problem is the Chinese Communist Party is not picking up the phone at the other end,” he said. “They’re not willing to engage. They’re not willing to abide by the international rules.”
The alternative, he said, is to “dramatically enhance our military deterrent in the Indo-Pacific in general and across the Taiwan Strait,” reduce dependence on China for critical goods, and push back against Chinese espionage, while making sure that “we’re working aggressively with our allies and partners to strengthen the free world as the Chinese Communist Party aggression grows greater.”
The Epoch Times has reached out to the State Department for comment.
Jackson Richman and NTD’s Melina Wisecup contributed to this report.
