Rubio applauds Panama’s choice to withdraw from Chinese infrastructure deal
Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Panama’s president as part of his Latin America tour as the top U.S. diplomat.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised Panama for deciding not to renew a trade and infrastructure development agreement with China, calling it a positive development for the country’s relationship with the United States.
The BRI was initiated by the Chinese regime in 2013 to create land and sea trade networks centered around Beijing by funding infrastructure projects across Southeast Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America.
Panama Canal
Rubio’s visit to Panama underscores Trump’s emphasis on reclaiming the Panama Canal, citing that Panama has breached a neutrality pledge due to China’s influence over the waterway.
The Neutrality Treaty, officially known as the Neutrality Treaty, allows the United States to use military force to safeguard the Panama Canal’s neutrality, essentially granting perpetual use of the waterway to the United States.
CK Hutchison Holdings, based in Hong Kong, manages the Balboa port on the Pacific side and the Cristóbal port at the Atlantic entrance of the canal. Two Chinese state-owned entities are presently constructing a fourth bridge over the canal.
“China is operating the Panama Canal, which was not handed to China, but foolishly given to Panama. They violated the agreement, and we will either take it back or something very powerful will happen,” stated Trump to reporters on Feb. 2.
Trump noted on Feb. 3 that he was scheduled to speak with Panamanian officials on Feb. 7.
The U.S. State Department reported on Feb. 2 that Rubio relayed a message from Trump emphasizing that China’s presence in Panama poses a threat to the canal and breaches the treaty.
Following talks with Rubio, Mulino indicated that, depending on the results of an audit, he would consider reviewing the 25-year concession granted to CK Hutchison Holdings for operating the two ports.
Ryan Berg, director of the Americas program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, suggested that the audit could provide a means to revoke the concessions if corruption is uncovered in the agreement.
“That gives Panama more legal grounds to back out of the concessions and reopen them so that an American or European company might win the bid,” Berg explained.
Reuters contributed to this report.