Rwanda Flights Policy ‘Working’ but Could Change Trafficking Pattern: UK Official

Spread the love


The UK government’s policy of sending some illegal immigrants to Rwanda appears to have begun to deter people from crossing the English Channel into the UK, but could encourage illegal immigrants to take more dangerous routes, the top civil servant in the Home Office has said.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced on April 14 that people who enter the UK illegally, including those who cross the English Channel in small boats, may end up being relocated to the African country of Rwanda. The UK government said the move is necessary to deter human smuggling.

Matthew Rycroft, the department’s permanent secretary told MPs on June 22 that, since the policy was announced, the number of illegal Channel crossings have not been rising as much as the Home Office’s projection for this year.

Appearing before the Home Affairs Committee in the House of Commons, Rycroft said: “There is already possibly the beginnings of some deterrent effect visible.”

“Although the numbers are higher than last year, the proportion higher is already a bit smaller since the announcement than it was before the announcement,” he said.

But he added: “It’s too early to say if that is because of the Rwanda policy or due to the weather.”

More Dangerous Routes

The top civil servant acknowledged that policy could cause changes in the pattern of illegal immigration by encouraging people smugglers to try new routes into the UK that are even more dangerous than the current ones.

He said: “I do agree we should be thinking about irregular migration in general and all of the different routes, and it would be a pyrrhic victory if this set of policies were successful in closing down the small boat route, but created something even more dangerous. That would not be a victory at all, so we need to make sure we’re thinking about this in the round.”

Not a single illegal immigrant has been deported to Rwanda yet, as the first planned flight was grounded due to an intervention by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

Home Secretary Priti Patel said the ECHR intervention was “disappointing and surprising” but the government remains “committed to this policy.”

Commenting on reports of some Home Office staff refusing to implement the policy, Rycroft told MPs: “It is irrelevant whatever any civil servant thinks about a policy, if the government of the day has determined that policy.”

He said civil servants are “here to serve the government of the day, that is duly elected.”

PA Media contributed to this report.

Alexander Zhang

Follow



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.