The Implications of New Gun Laws on Freedom of Speech and Thought
Free speech and freedom of thought are fundamental aspects of our democratic society, so it is concerning that the Bill in question could potentially undermine these rights.
Commentary
The Bill seeks to erode an individual’s right to remain silent and their property rights. It operates on the assumption of guilt by association, discriminates based on health or disability, and challenges the principles of free speech and freedom of opinion.
The right to remain silent has historically been a pillar of democracy, safeguarding individuals against unfair legal processes and arbitrary judgments, as seen in England’s Star Chamber era.
It serves as a shield against unjust actions by law enforcement or the judiciary, who possess vast resources and the ability to present questionable or biased evidence.
Related Stories
The Firearms Bill’s Section 368 threatens individuals with a fine if they refuse to answer questions posed by a police officer under this Act, effectively depriving them of their right to remain silent.
Free Speech and Beliefs Also Under Threat
Section 150 empowers the WA police commissioner to consider an individual’s views, opinions, and attitudes.
Given that free speech and freedom of thought are crucial to our society, it is concerning that the Bill may challenge these rights.
While it would be reasonable to specify membership in a dangerous terrorist organization or holding harmful beliefs, the Bill’s vague language leaves the interpretation of “views, opinions, and attitudes” open-ended.
Furthermore, Section 150 allows for scrutiny of an individual’s “conduct and behavior,” with unclear guidelines on what constitutes acceptable behavior.
This ambiguity could lead to consequences like denying a license to someone who protested at a Chinese consulate during trade negotiations, highlighting the Bill’s potential overreach.
Police Given Room to Interpret Potential Threats
The Bill grants the police authority to make moral judgments based on an individual’s lifestyle or domestic circumstances, without defining the parameters of these criteria.
It also permits negative assessments of people’s lifestyles and living arrangements, raising concerns among Indigenous communities who rely on a mobile lifestyle and hunting for sustenance.
Sections 148, 150, 153, and 399 of the Bill introduce the possibility of medical or disability discrimination, lacking clear and objective medical standards and placing additional burdens on healthcare professionals.
The Bill and its associated reforms pose a threat to various rights, including property rights and the ability of property owners to control access to their land.
The rushed passage of the Firearms Bill, along with attempts to bypass legislative scrutiny, resembles the undemocratic power grabs witnessed during the COVID crisis.
It’s essential for citizens of WA to demand proper scrutiny of this Bill and safeguard their rights in the face of potential overreach by the government.
Views expressed in this article reflect the author’s opinions and do not necessarily represent those of The Epoch Times.
