Tory MP calls for identification of Liberal Party member who allegedly warned Han Dong of CSIS surveillance
A Conservative MP is urging the Liberal government to reveal the party member who reportedly tipped off Han Dong about being surveilled by Canada’s intelligence agency.
The warning allegedly came after CSIS informed the Liberal Party in September 2019 that the Chinese government was purportedly interfering in the nomination process for the Don Valley North riding.
Mr. Dong has not responded to inquiries from The Epoch Times.
Liberal Party director Azam Ishmael, who received the CSIS briefing, told the Globe that “I have never discussed classified information with individuals who did not have the necessary security clearance to access the information.”
CSIS also reports that the Chinese consulate made “veiled threats” to students that they could lose their student visas or face consequences for their families in the PRC if they didn’t vote for Mr. Dong.
Mr. Trudeau was briefed by his adviser about the irregularities following the CSIS briefing to the Liberal Party, but he decided to proceed with Mr. Dong, who later won the seat in the House of Commons in 2019. Mr. Dong resigned from the Liberal Party in March 2023 to sit as an Independent MP after several articles from Global News were published.
The news agency published articles based on national security leaks accusing Mr. Dong of advising the Chinese consul general in Toronto on the detention of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor. Mr. Dong has refuted the allegations and filed a defamation lawsuit against Global News. He expressed his desire to rejoin the Liberal Party.
During the inquiry, Mr. Dong was asked whether he believed there was Chinese interference in Canadian elections, to which he replied, “I see reports about that. I currently don’t see any evidence.”
Janice Charette, former clerk of the Privy Council and member of the 2021 Critical Election Incident Public Protocol panel, stated during the inquiry that the issues surrounding the Don Valley North nomination were not believed to meet the threshold to inform the Canadian public.