World News

US Financial Giants Abandon Climate Finance Coalition as HSBC Postpones Net-Zero Goal by Two Decades


HSBC mentioned that it has revised its net zero ambition to align with the most current best practice guidance.

HSBC has postponed its target of achieving net-zero carbon emissions across its operations and supply chain from 2030 to 2050, due to slower progress in the broader economy.

In its annual report, released on Wednesday, HSBC now aims to achieve the net-zero goal two decades later than initially planned, expecting a 40 percent reduction in emissions across its operations, travel, and supply chain by 2030.

The bank clarified that its original 2030 target relied on using carbon credits to offset supply chain emissions, a method no longer supported by recent guidance from the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), an organization assessing corporate climate objectives.

“As such, we have reevaluated this ambition in light of the most current best practice guidance,” the bank explained.

Julian Wentzel, HSBC’s chief sustainability officer, acknowledged the challenges faced by companies in transitioning to more sustainable practices.

“I have firsthand experience working with clients and understand the struggles they encounter in their transition. These challenges are significant,” Wentzel told Reuters.

He also suggested that while HSBC would take a more cautious approach to lending in the oil and gas sector, the revised target did not necessarily signal significant changes in financing strategies for specific industries.

HSBC’s review of its net zero transition plan update will be made public in the second half of 2025.

HSBC’s adjusted target aligns its climate commitments with other major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs and Barclays, which have also set a goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Net Zero and Remuneration

The delay in HSBC’s net-zero timeline reflects a broader trend of financial institutions modifying aspects of their approach to net zero.

Barclays and Natwest, two of the UK’s largest banks, have decided to remove climate targets from their annual bonus schemes for senior executives.

Instead of linking sustainability goals to yearly bonuses, the banks will now include them in long-term share-based incentive plans. This change better reflects their long-term climate objectives and avoids the volatility of short-term targets.

At Natwest, sustainability metrics will have a 15 percent weighting in its chief executive’s performance share plan, rather than accounting for 10 percent of his bonus. This is subject to approval by shareholders at the group’s annual meeting in April.

Critics have raised concerns about HSBC’s decision, including Zahra Hdidou, senior climate and resilience advisor at ActionAid UK, who described the shift to 2050 as “deeply concerning.”

She added, “Despite claiming to be ‘the world’s local bank,’ HSBC appears to be prioritizing profit margins and internal agendas over environmental and human rights considerations. The bank can no longer ignore the environmental and social harm it is perpetuating,” and called on the bank to reverse the delay before its annual general meeting in May.

Net-Zero Banking Alliance Under Pressure

HSBC’s announcement comes in the midst of increasing pressure on the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a group of banks committed to aligning their lending and investment portfolios with net-zero emissions by 2050.

Several U.S. banks, including Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citibank, and Bank of America, withdrew from the NZBA in December 2024, followed by Morgan Stanley in January. As a result, only three U.S. banks—Amalgamated Bank, Areti Bank, and Climate First Bank—remain among the alliance’s 135 members.

Conversely, 81 of its members are based in Europe, with 12 UK banks like NatWest and Barclays among them.

Regarding the departure of U.S. banks from the NZBA, Jeanne Martin, head of the banking program at ShareAction, commented, “While it’s concerning that some U.S. banks are signaling that climate change is less of a priority, the NZBA Secretariat should view their exit as an opportunity to collaborate with remaining members to establish more ambitious industry standards, forming a coalition of firms dedicated to the cause.”

She suggested that the absence of U.S. banks could create space for regulators to implement more ambitious climate policies.

Recently, Macquarie Group became the first Australian bank to withdraw from the alliance, citing adequate support for decarbonization and no longer needing NZBA membership.
In statements on Wednesday, HSBC’s CEO Georges Elhedery confirmed that HSBC remains part of the alliance. When asked about the possibility of HSBC exiting the NZBA given the recent alterations to its climate strategy, he refrained from providing a definitive answer.

The European Union (EU) continues to uphold its renewable energy policies and binding commitments to becoming the first climate-neutral continent by 2050.

In contrast, the U.S. energy policy under President Donald Trump emphasizes domestic drilling and increased liquid natural gas exports to Europe, potentially impacting the EU’s ambitious net-zero objectives.

The greater supply of U.S. fossil fuels to Europe could hinder European banks and businesses from fully transitioning to renewable energy sources.

PA media contributed to this report. 



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.