World News

Review of Security Guard Weapons Following Stabbings in NSW


The government is not considering policy changes in relation to stun guns or firearms.

Weapon restrictions for security guards in NSW will be reviewed after a deadly mass stabbing at a Sydney shopping centre, although the government has already ruled out access to firearms.

Faraz Tahir, a security worker at Westfield Bondi Junction, was one of six people killed in the attack, prompting calls for guards to be armed with weapons such as pepper spray, handcuffs, batons, and even Tasers.

Under rules governing the most common security license class in NSW, officers are empowered to patrol, protect, or guard property but cannot be armed.

Premier Chris Minns said he would not make any immediate changes, but there would be a review of the regulations – except those relating to firearms.

“The government is not considering policy changes in relation to stun guns or firearms,” he said on April 15.

“I don’t believe that more firearms in the community is a good decision.”

Related Stories

Prime Minister Laments the ‘Misinformation’ on Social Media Amid Bondi Stabbing
‘Strong Gun Laws’ Stopped Deaths in Bondi Attack, Says Australian Prime Minister

The review will cover rules for guards in crowded places and hospitals, where people suffering from mental health conditions or others could pose a threat.

“You would appreciate that in some instances there are violent interactions on wards in emergency departments, or ICUs, involving individuals that may have a mental health condition,” the premier said.

But Mr. Minns said it was unclear if “alternative equipment” for security guards would have resulted in a different outcome on April 13.

“The truth of the matter is, we may never know,” he said.

Queensland man Joel Cauchi, 40, had experienced long-term mental health issues before he carried out the stabbing, which ended when he was shot dead by a police inspector.

Both the NSW opposition and United Workers Union, which represents security guards, said it was too early to comment on the issue.

The review comes after the government in 2023 announced a probe into the adequacy of protections for frontline health workers.

An earlier inquiry urged stronger safety measures, including a trial of defensive gear, for security staff.

Sydney-based security expert Gina Field urged the government to relax rules on body armor to allow easier access for security guards.

Ms. Field, the head of security firm NRS, said an exemption for the protective vests from rules classifying them as prohibited weapons would bolster guard safety.

“Most guards are ‘armed’ with nothing more than a mobile phone and radio, and that’s just not good enough,” she said.



Source link

TruthUSA

I'm TruthUSA, the author behind TruthUSA News Hub located at https://truthusa.us/. With our One Story at a Time," my aim is to provide you with unbiased and comprehensive news coverage. I dive deep into the latest happenings in the US and global events, and bring you objective stories sourced from reputable sources. My goal is to keep you informed and enlightened, ensuring you have access to the truth. Stay tuned to TruthUSA News Hub to discover the reality behind the headlines and gain a well-rounded perspective on the world.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.