Is Lawfare Set to Take Over Our Politics Permanently?

We Need a 28th Amendment to Stop Presidential Lawfare

There is a growing concern about the left’s continuous legal battles against Donald Trump, commonly known as “Lawfare,” and the potential consequences if this trend continues.

While the media focuses on the daily details of these legal battles, it is essential to consider the broader implications of these actions. The left’s pursuit of legal action against Trump is not about upholding the law but rather about gaining political advantage.

The charges brought against Trump by Democrats in federal and state courts represent a significant departure from constitutional norms and pose a threat to the country’s system of government.

The possibility of a former president facing criminal charges and being convicted due to politically motivated prosecutions raises serious concerns about the state of our democracy.

To address this constitutional crisis, there is a need for a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This proposed amendment would establish a process for indicting or trying a former president for criminal offenses, ensuring that such actions are based on legal grounds rather than political motives.

By implementing this amendment, Congress would have the authority to determine the validity of criminal charges against a president or former president, safeguarding the independence of the judicial process.

The introduction of a 28th Amendment would not solve all issues related to presidential lawfare, but it would serve as a crucial step in protecting our democracy and maintaining the integrity of our government.

Augustus Howard, a scholar with expertise in politics and ethics, advocates for the adoption of this proposed amendment to prevent the abuse of legal proceedings for political gain.