Letters to the Editor — April 26, 2023
The Issue: An ex-CIA director’s testimony on the letter from 51 intel experts on The Post’s Hunter Biden story.
The blatant revelation by a former top director of a government agency marks the beginning of the end (“Spy-Media Collusion,” Editorial, April 22).
Testimony by former acting CIA Director Mike Morrell is the trigger of an impending “domino effect.”
We can expect many more individuals to be coming forward voluntarily as whistleblowers or by subpoena as the investigation of this debacle widens.
The house of cards is falling fast, and the players will be jockeying to sever ties with this administration to save face.
Ronald G. Frank
West Orange, NJ
The words “dirty pool” came to mind after it was revealed that the letter signed by 51 notable government people was created out of whole cloth to sway voters on behalf of President Biden.
The underhanded move gave Biden an unfair advantage through devious means.
While this act does not fit the statutory definitions of election interference, it nonetheless had the same effect.
The only saving grace now is the fact that the truth has surfaced.
And that the signers of this document will bear the stigma of having knowingly sold their souls for political gain and damaged the American democratic process we cherish.
Phil Serpico, Queens
As the evidence of Biden family corruption and influence-peddling continues to pile up, the Justice Department will continue to act uninterested.
At some point, when this whole thing blows wide open, it will be forced to act.
The members of the Biden clan who have been identified as receiving payments from foreign governments collectively lack the talent or expertise needed to have earned those payments.
The only explanation can be that they had access to the decision -maker, the “Big Guy.”
The Justice Department, for its part, must also be held accountable for its lack of action in this case.
Sometimes the coverup is bigger than the crime.
Bo Madden
Jupiter, Fla.
Another person who should be called to testify on the Democrats’ campaign to spread lies about their opponents or to cover up their own shortcomings is leftist reporter Natasha Bertrand.
She was the go-to journalist to spread the lie about the Steele Dossier and then the letter signed by those 51 liars about Hunter’s laptop.
Is she a reporter or just a propagandist for the Democratic Party?
Bruce Collins
Middletown, NJ
The Issue: Two senior Bud Light executives going on leave after backlash to a can featuring a trans woman.
It doesn’t take a degree in higher learning to understand that the successful marketing of a product requires knowing who your audience actually is (“Bud’s gotten wiser,” April 22).
For the typical American beer-drinker, it’s probably all about the enjoyment that comes with sipping a favorite ice-cold one after work is done.
Injecting a highly controversial social issue into the enjoyment of that favorite ice-cold beer is a gauntlet that should never have been thrown.
Vincent Ruggiero
Scottsdale, Ariz.
I think it’s important to mention that not everyone who has stopped drinking Bud Light did so because of a picture on a can that was not for retail sale.
Most of us stopped because of what was said by then-executive Alissa Heinerscheid.
She pretty much insinuated that current drinkers of Bud Light are cavemen and are not welcome.
She could have easily been inclusive by saying they loved current drinkers of Bud Light, but they were also trying to expand the customer base.
Peter Boeko
Manorville
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy and style.
