California Medicaid Expenditures Provide Abundant Opportunities for GOP Critique
Federal Medicaid reductions should not put essential health care for low-income Californians at risk.
Opinion
Several anomalies in California’s health care funding should catch federal scrutiny.
Proactive Measures to Include Undocumented Immigrants
California is among a select few states that have extended their Medicaid programs to undocumented immigrants. Unlike New York and Illinois, which restrict these benefits to specific age groups, California (along with Oregon) provides coverage to all individuals, regardless of age or immigration status.
While state expenditures typically fall outside of federal jurisdiction, California and other states are allowed to charge the federal Medicaid program for a portion of emergency and maternity care provided to undocumented immigrants.
High Emergency Room Utilization by the Homeless
California has a notably high population of homeless individuals, many of whom struggle with substance abuse issues. Some frequent emergency room visits are due to overdose-related incidents.
Expanded Benefits for Seniors
Medicaid typically covers nursing home care or alternatives for eligible low-income seniors. To evaluate whether a senior qualifies for Medicaid benefits, states generally apply both income and asset assessments.
While a senior might not have the income to cover nursing home expenses, it has been presumed that they would liquidate assets before relying on assistance from the government. However, in 2024, California abolished its asset test, allowing wealthier seniors requiring skilled nursing care to pass on their wealth to heirs instead of using it to pay for high nursing home costs.
Reliance on Provider Taxation
Similar to most states, California levies taxes on medical providers to fund Medicaid services and garner federal matching funds. However, the state employs particularly aggressive tactics in its approach to provider taxation.
Supplemental Payments for Ambulance Services
California negotiated a unique agreement with HHS to provide local fire departments additional compensation for emergency ambulance services offered to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. This supplemental fee, set at $1,050 per trip, is in addition to the base fare of $118 paid to all ambulance providers, both private and public.
Misallocation of Funds Beyond Health Care
California leads in a Biden-era initiative to expand Medicaid to cover so-called “social determinants of health,” which are non-medical factors that impact health outcomes.
Conclusion
California has demonstrated a variety of approaches to secure increased federal Medicaid funding, benefiting undocumented immigrants, medical and non-medical service providers, firefighters, and even affluent seniors’ heirs.
A dedicated effort through a state-level Department of Government Efficiency could help clarify more of the complexities and extraneous spending related to Medi-Cal. Yet, even with the existing evidence, it is reasonable to assert that cuts to federal Medicaid funding need not threaten essential health care for low-income individuals residing in California.
The views expressed in this article represent the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of The Epoch Times.