US News

Congress Can’t Control Federal Bureaucracy Without First Growing Oversight Staff, Resources: Experts

Distressed Patriotic Flag Unisex T-Shirt - Celebrate Comfort and Country $11.29 USD Get it here>>

Congress has little hope of ever regaining effective oversight and control of the federal regulatory bureaucracy in the executive branch without a major expansion of its authorities, staff,  and organizational resources, according to a new analysis by a conservative think tank that specializes in high technology issues.

“Every year, the White House and federal agencies issue regulations and administrative actions that directly affect the ways that Americans live and work, with limited input from members of Congress, the elected representatives of the people,” states the analysis “Empowering Regulatory Oversight: How Congress Can Hold the Administrative State Accountable.”

It is written by Dan Lips and Satya Thallam and published by the Foundation for American Innovation (FAI).

Lips, FAI’s head of policy and a Senior Fellow was formerly policy director for the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs (HSGAC).

Thallam has served in multiple positions in both the legislative and executive branches, as well as the private sector.

The problem is Congress has delegated so much authority to executive branch officials, departments, and agencies to issue a suffocating multitude of rules, regulations, and “guidance”—that the legislative branch has effectively become unable to ensure that the will of the American people is respected by the bureaucracy, or what Lips and Thallam describe as the Administrative State.

“In 2022 alone, agencies issued more than more than 3,000 administrative publications that could properly be thought of as regulatory, including 265 ‘significant rules,’ with an estimated cost of over $117 billion. While it is impossible to quantify the annual cost of federal regulations on the economy, estimates have approached $2 trillion,” Lips and Thallam explain.

“Congress enables federal agencies to issue regulations and rules by passing laws that give the executive branch the legal authority to issue regulations and administrative rules.

“But the legislative branch has largely ceded control of regulations and the administrative state to the executive. Congress has not established the necessary legislative powers, expertise, and staff resources to adequately oversee federal regulations,” they continue.

Congress Fired and Forgot

Lips and Thallam note that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)—which Congress had created in 1980 in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act—was converted by President Ronald Reagan into “the hub of regulatory oversight and analysis within the executive branch. However, Congress did not establish a legislative counterpart to OIRA, leaving the legislative branch dependent on an executive office led by an official nominated by the president for systematic reviews of federal regulatory activity.”

By contrast, the authors write, “Congress relies upon an internal budget office [the Congressional Budget Office] to provide prospective estimates of fiscal effects alongside the White House’s own Office of Management and Budget. No such congressional office exists for regulatory effects.”

Congress has only a few legislative committees and subcommittees, and limited budget and staffing resources within the Government Accounting Office (GAO), to assess the cost and effectiveness of proposed federal actions, but those cannot begin to match the executive branch’s ability to churn out new rules and regulations.

Lips and Thallam estimate that, based on word counts of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), there are currently more than 1.1 million distinct directives targeting individual citizens, businesses, and other institutions—a 175 percent increase since the total was just over 400,000 in 1968.

The House Republican majority has approved the Congressional Research Service (CRS), but could do so at any time it chooses.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)—one of the Senate’s leading voices against waste, fraud, and abuse in government—expressed enthusiasm for the work of GAO, telling The Epoch Times that its “ongoing effort to identify duplication and inefficiencies has produced $600 billion in cost savings for taxpayers in a little over a decade, often with bipartisan support.

“This is a great model for strengthening Congress’ ability to enhance oversight and provide unbiased regulatory analysis to counter the administrative state.”

Ernst agreed that “while control of the levers of power in Washington frequently changes hands, the size, scope, power, and duplicity of the administrative state continues to grow and expand regardless of who occupies the White House or Congress. The federal government is now involved in nearly every aspect of our lives, and it will take a concerted, long-term strategy to unwind those tentacles.”

And Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) offered her own proposal for limiting the federal bureaucracy, saying to The Epoch Times that “Americans are tired of big government bureaucracy. The deep state is out of control and constantly pushing its own agenda. To rein in the federal government, we need to term limit bureaucrats.”

Source link


I'm TruthUSA, the author behind TruthUSA News Hub located at With our One Story at a Time," my aim is to provide you with unbiased and comprehensive news coverage. I dive deep into the latest happenings in the US and global events, and bring you objective stories sourced from reputable sources. My goal is to keep you informed and enlightened, ensuring you have access to the truth. Stay tuned to TruthUSA News Hub to discover the reality behind the headlines and gain a well-rounded perspective on the world.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.