US News

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Counties Cannot Count Ballots Without Dates



Several counties made the decision to count ballots despite a previous ruling by the state supreme court on the matter.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has issued an order to counties in the state, instructing them not to count mail-in ballots that are undated, after several counties had indicated they would do so.

The directive was issued on Nov. 18 as the state began a recount process for the U.S. Senate race. Decision Desk HQ and The Associated Press had both called the race for Republican Dave McCormick, who was running against incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.). However, because McCormick’s lead was within a 0.5 percent margin, a recount was required by state law.

The decision ordered all 67 counties in the state to adhere to prior court rulings that specified undated mail-in and absentee ballots not meeting the requirements of the Pennsylvania Election Code should not be counted for the November 5, 2024 election.

“This order shall be considered definitive and binding for all county election board members,” the court stated.

The court’s order specifically mentioned three county boards of elections—Bucks, Montgomery, and Philadelphia—that had chosen to count the undated ballots.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Pennsylvania Republican Party had filed lawsuits against county officials who had counted such ballots.

A similar dispute had arisen right before the November 5 election. A state appeals court had ruled that not counting undated ballots in a special election violated the state constitution. On November 1, the state supreme court responded with an order that stayed the appeals court decision while clarifying that it did not apply to the general election on November 5.

Justice Christine Donohue of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a dissenting statement, arguing that “there is nothing exceptional or urgent about the Petitioners’ challenges” and that the RNC had “an existing avenue of review for their challenges to the decisions of these Boards of Elections.”

Justices David Wecht and Kevin Brobson also issued statements concurring with the court’s decision.

“I am writing separately to make it clear to local election officials that they do not have the authority to ignore provisions of the Election Code that they believe are unconstitutional,” Brobson stated, along with Wecht and Justice Sallie Mundy. “Only the courts under our charter have the power to declare a statute, or part of one, unconstitutional.”

This story is still developing and will be updated.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.