Federal Government Grappling with Difficult Decisions in Encouraging Employees to Return to the Office
The federal government is facing a tough decision regarding the return of federal public servants to the office for three days a week.
Aaron Wudrick, the director of domestic policy at the MacDonald Laurier Institute in Ottawa, described the dilemma as being “between a rock and a hard place.”
“I think that the feds are in a real sticky spot right now,” Mr. Wudrick told The Epoch Times, noting the pressure from public sector unions threatening a “summer of discontent” if workers are forced back to the office three days a week instead of two.
“If they do cave into the unions, a lot of Canadians … are going to say, you know, give them another reason to throw the bums out, because they’re going to say these guys are in the pockets of the unions,” said Mr. Wudrick.
The unions are challenging the decision by filing legal actions and encouraging individual grievances from their 270,000 members of public servants.
The unions argue that the move violates previously negotiated agreements regarding telework changes with the federal government.
Federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh voiced support for the unions’ position and emphasized the importance of respecting agreements with workers.
Meanwhile, the federal government asserts its right to modify the hybrid work model as needed.
Treasury Board Minister Anita Anand stated that a four-month transition period to a hybrid work environment exists, which falls outside collective agreements.
Mr. Wudrick observed a standstill between the two sides and highlighted the public’s perception of federal public servants having an easier workload compared to the private sector.
He emphasized the importance of measuring performance rather than focusing on the location of work, as productivity is key.
The issue may escalate soon as members of the Canada Border Services Agency consider a strike vote due to concerns about telework for non-uniformed employees.