Internet Expert Believes Bill Aimed at Protecting Youth Online Could Grant Ottawa Greater Censorship Authority
A government bill to restrict underage access to pornography may hinder the privacy of Canadians and give Ottawa stronger online censorship control, according to an internet expert.
Law professor and Canada Research Chair of Internet and E-Commerce Law Michael Geist recently raised concerns about the enforcement measures tucked into Bill S-210.
Bill S-210 was designed to protect children from accessing online pornography. It has already passed through the Senate and was given a second reading in the House of Commons on Dec. 13. The bill is now under review by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
According to Mr. Geist, enforcement of the bill is left to a regulatory agency (likely the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission, or CRTC) that could issue violation notices that list the steps an organization must take to comply with the law.
“This literally means the government via its regulatory agency will dictate to sites how they must interact with users to ensure no underage access,” he wrote. “If the site fails to act as instructed within 20 days, the regulator can apply for a court order mandating that Canadian ISPs block the site from their subscribers.”
Related Stories
Moreover, he argues, blocking the sites may prove a form of censorship because other material—even content that is not sexually explicit—would be blocked.
“This raises the prospect of full censorship of lawful content under court order based on notices from a government agency,” he wrote.
Mr. Geist noted that the bill is not limited to pornography sites, but any online service or site that makes “sexually-explicit materials available.”
“This would presumably include search engines, social media sites such as Twitter, or chat forums such as Reddit, where access to explicit material is not hard to find,” he wrote.
He also raised concerns over the age verification system that the bill endorses.
“This effectively means that sites will require their users to register with commercial age verification systems in order to run a search or access some tweets. And the age verification systems raise real privacy concerns, including mandated face recognition as part of the verification process.”
During the debate in the Senate, the bill was changed in response to some of these concerns.
Ms. Martin acknowledged concerns about the bill but noted that an amendment proposed could reduce the worry.
“The amendment specifies that the Governor-in-Council must consider, before prescribing an age-verification method, whether the method is reliable; maintains user privacy and protects user personal information; collects and uses personal information solely for age-verification purposes, except to the extent required by law; destroys any personal information collected for age-verification purposes once the verification is completed; and generally complies with best practices in the fields of age verification and privacy protection,” she said.
Mr. Geist’s blog notes that trying to protect children from inappropriate content is “a laudable goal,” but should not permit government censorship.
“Creating safeguards for underage access to inappropriate content is a laudable goal, but not at the cost of government-backed censorship, mandated face recognition, and age-approval requirements to use some of the most popular sites and services in the world,” he concluded.
Bill C-11
It’s not the first time that the professor has raised the alarm over Ottawa’s online regulations. In October, he said that Bill C-11 was the beginning of an Internet regulatory framework being introduced by the federal government, some of which could hinder freedom of speech.
In September, it was announced that any streaming service with earnings over $10 million is required to register with the CRTC.
Mr. Geist said the move runs counter to freedom of expression.
