Saskatchewan Nurses College Vindicates Nurse of COVID Misinformation Allegations
The College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan (CRNS) has cleared nurse Leah McInnes of charges of spreading misinformation through her opposition to vaccine mandates.
Ms. McInnes, a registered nurse since 2013 and mother of two, was charged by the CRNS’s Investigation Committee for her social media advocacy against vaccine mandates.
“If your boss tells you that you must submit to them and be penetrated in a number of ways in their authoritative way,,[sic] coerced through threat, manipulation, ultimatum, shaming etc, what do we normally call this?” states one of Ms. McInnes’s posts detailed by the committee in its decision.
The committee accused her of using the term “vaccine mandate” in a manner that constituted misinformation. However, her use of the term was found to align with its general understanding in public discourse.
Related Stories
Ms. McInnes’s stance centred on medical ethics and the right to informed consent, citing emerging scientific evidence that COVID vaccines do not prevent virus transmission. Her opposition to vaccine mandates as a violation of ethical principles gained public attention, particularly when the Saskatchewan government initially indicated no intention to enforce such mandates due to privacy and personal rights concerns.
However, institutions such as the Canadian Medical Association Journal advocated for mandatory vaccination as early as February 2021.
The case against Ms. McInnes drew criticism for its potential impact on professional freedom of speech. Her legal team, including co-counsel Andre Memauri and Glenn Blackett, argued that the charges undermined a health professional’s right to participate in democratic discourse and ethical dissent. They emphasized the importance of professionals expressing their sincere beliefs for the integrity of science, ethics, and democracy.
Ms. McInnes’s defence was further bolstered by expert testimony, including that of former Chief Medical Officer of Health of Ontario Dr. Richard Schabas, who confirmed the non-specific medical nature of the term “vaccine mandate.” Additionally, evidence presented during the hearings corroborated Ms. McInnes’s statements about the vaccines not providing sterilizing immunity.
In a statement following the verdict, Ms. McInnes expressed gratitude for the CRNS Discipline Committee’s recognition of her rights.
“I very much value the right of my colleagues to express opinions different than mine and support them in their endeavours to seek change in healthcare and government policy they perceive to be in the public interest,” she said in a statement.
The Epoch Times contacted the JCCF for further information but it did not respond before press time.
